CR-p -- Fixed Effects Model
Schematic with Example Data
Level a1
a2 a3 a4 Total
4
6
3
3
1
3
2
2
4
5
4
3
2
3
4
3
5
6
5
4
3
4
3
4
3
5
6
5
6
7
8
10
Mean 3.0
3.5 4.25 6.25 4.25
sd 1.51 0.93 1.04 2.12 1.88
Or in abbreviated form:
Level a1
a2 a3 a4 Total
S1
n=8
S2
n=8
S3
n=8
S4
n=8
Mean 3.0
3.5 4.25 6.25 4.25
sd 1.51 0.93 1.04 2.12 1.88
Where each Sj is an independent randomly assigned group of subjects.
Linear Model
Yij is the score for the ith observation in the
jth treatment level
Y'j is the predicted value for the jth treatment level and is
equal to the mean of the group
μ is the overall population mean (grand mean)
αj is the effect of A treatment level j which is equal to
μj - μ and is subject to the
restriction that Σαj = 0 over j
εi(j) is the error effect associated with Yij
and is equal to Yij - μ - αj .
The error effect is a random variable that is
distributed NID(0,s2ε)
Hypotheses
1. The linear model reflects all sources of variation.
2. The experiment contains all the treatment levels of interest.
3. The εi(j) are independent of each other.
4. The εi(j) are normally distributed.
5. The εi(j) have equal variance in the population.
Notes:
Assumptions 1 & 2 are concerned with model specification.
Because μ and αj are constants, the following holds
ANOVA Summary Table
| Source | SS | df | MS | F | p-value | |
| Between Groups | 49.0 | 3 | 16.333 | 7.50 | 0.0008 | |
| Within Groups | 61.0 | 28 | 2.179 | |||
| Total | 110.0 | 31 |
The ANOVA Summary Table may also look like this:
| Source | SS | df | MS | F | p-value | |
| Treatment | 49.0 | 3 | 16.333 | 7.50 | 0.0008 | |
| Error | 61.0 | 28 | 2.179 | |||
| Total | 110.0 | 31 |
Expected Mean Squares

Correctly Formed F-ratios

Table of Group Means and Variances
| a1 | a2 | a3 | a4 | |
| Mean | 3.00 | 3.50 | 4.25 | 6.25 |
| Variance | 2.29 | 0.86 | 1.07 | 4.50 |
| Std Dev | 1.51 | 0.93 | 1.04 | 2.12 |
A Measure of Strength of Association
Omega-squared (ω2) is the recommended measure of strength of association for fixed-effects analysis of variance models.

From the Example:
49 - (3)2.179
ω2 = --------------- = 0.3785
110 + 2.179
The following guidelines are suggested by Cohen (1989):
In terms of the fhat index of effect size:
Note: The fhat index of effect size should not be confused with Cohen's d index of effect size. The fhat index is derived directly form the ω2.
Model for Orthogonal Coding
G X1 X2 X3 1 1 1 1 2 -1 1 1 3 0 -2 1 4 0 0 -3
Stata Computer Example
input y grp x1 x2 x3
4 1 1 1 1
6 1 1 1 1
3 1 1 1 1
3 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
3 1 1 1 1
2 1 1 1 1
2 1 1 1 1
4 2 -1 1 1
5 2 -1 1 1
4 2 -1 1 1
3 2 -1 1 1
2 2 -1 1 1
3 2 -1 1 1
4 2 -1 1 1
3 2 -1 1 1
5 3 0 -2 1
6 3 0 -2 1
5 3 0 -2 1
4 3 0 -2 1
3 3 0 -2 1
4 3 0 -2 1
3 3 0 -2 1
4 3 0 -2 1
3 4 0 0 -3
5 4 0 0 -3
6 4 0 0 -3
5 4 0 0 -3
6 4 0 0 -3
7 4 0 0 -3
8 4 0 0 -3
10 4 0 0 -3
end
tabstat y, by(grp) stat(n mean sd var)
Summary for variables: y
by categories of: grp
grp | N mean sd variance
---------+----------------------------------------
1 | 8 3 1.511858 2.285714
2 | 8 3.5 .9258201 .8571429
3 | 8 4.25 1.035098 1.071429
4 | 8 6.25 2.12132 4.5
---------+----------------------------------------
Total | 32 4.25 1.883716 3.548387
--------------------------------------------------
display 2.12132/.9258201
2.2912875
histogram y, by(grp) normal

robvar y, by(grp) /* W0 is Levene's test of homoscedasticity */
| Summary of y
grp | Mean Std. Dev. Freq.
------------+------------------------------------
1 | 3 1.5118579 8
2 | 3.5 .9258201 8
3 | 4.25 1.0350983 8
4 | 6.25 2.1213203 8
------------+------------------------------------
Total | 4.25 1.8837163 32
W0 = 1.292876 df(3, 28) Pr > F = .29625408
W50 = 1.037037 df(3, 28) Pr > F = .39138742
W10 = 1.292876 df(3, 28) Pr > F = .29625408
anova y grp
Number of obs = 32 R-squared = 0.4455
Root MSE = 1.476 Adj R-squared = 0.3860
Source | Partial SS df MS F Prob > F
-----------+----------------------------------------------------
Model | 49.00 3 16.3333333 7.50 0.0008
|
grp | 49.00 3 16.3333333 7.50 0.0008
|
Residual | 61.00 28 2.17857143
-----------+----------------------------------------------------
Total | 110.00 31 3.5483871
/* user written program -- findit effectsize */
effectsize grp
anova effect size for grp with dep var = y
total variance accounted for
omega2 = .37854187
eta2 = .44545455
Cohen's f = .78046067
partial variance accounted for
partial omega2 = .37854187
partial eta2 = .44545455
/* Tukey-Kramer pairwise comparisons */
/* user written program -- findit tkcomp */
tkcomp grp
Tukey-Kramer pairwise comparisons for variable grp
studentized range critical value(.05, 4, 28) = 3.8613586
mean
grp vs grp group means dif TK-test
-------------------------------------------------------
1 vs 2 3.0000 3.5000 0.5000 0.9581
1 vs 3 3.0000 4.2500 1.2500 2.3954
1 vs 4 3.0000 6.2500 3.2500 6.2279*
2 vs 3 3.5000 4.2500 0.7500 1.4372
2 vs 4 3.5000 6.2500 2.7500 5.2698*
3 vs 4 4.2500 6.2500 2.0000 3.8326
oneway y grp, noanova sidak bonferroni scheffe
Comparison of y by grp
(Bonferroni)
Row Mean-|
Col Mean | 1 2 3
---------+---------------------------------
2 | .5
| 1.000
|
3 | 1.25 .75
| 0.608 1.000
|
4 | 3.25 2.75 2
| 0.001 0.005 0.068
Comparison of y by grp
(Scheffe)
Row Mean-|
Col Mean | 1 2 3
---------+---------------------------------
2 | .5
| 0.927
|
3 | 1.25 .75
| 0.427 0.794
|
4 | 3.25 2.75 2
| 0.002 0.009 0.085
Comparison of y by grp
(Sidak)
Row Mean-|
Col Mean | 1 2 3
---------+---------------------------------
2 | .5
| 0.985
|
3 | 1.25 .75
| 0.474 0.900
|
4 | 3.25 2.75 2
| 0.001 0.005 0.066
/* regression with orthogonal coding */
regress y x1 x2 x3
Source | SS df MS Number of obs = 32
-------------+------------------------------ F( 3, 28) = 7.50
Model | 49.00 3 16.3333333 Prob > F = 0.0008
Residual | 61.00 28 2.17857143 R-squared = 0.4455
-------------+------------------------------ Adj R-squared = 0.3860
Total | 110.00 31 3.5483871 Root MSE = 1.476
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
y | Coef. Std. Err. t P>|t| [95% Conf. Interval]
-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
x1 | -.25 .3689996 -0.68 0.504 -1.005861 .5058614
x2 | -.3333333 .213042 -1.56 0.129 -.7697301 .1030635
x3 | -.6666667 .1506435 -4.43 0.000 -.9752458 -.3580875
_cons | 4.25 .2609221 16.29 0.000 3.715525 4.784475
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
/* regression with dummy coding */
regress y i.grp
Source | SS df MS Number of obs = 32
-------------+------------------------------ F( 3, 28) = 7.50
Model | 49 3 16.3333333 Prob > F = 0.0008
Residual | 61 28 2.17857143 R-squared = 0.4455
-------------+------------------------------ Adj R-squared = 0.3860
Total | 110 31 3.5483871 Root MSE = 1.476
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
y | Coef. Std. Err. t P>|t| [95% Conf. Interval]
-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
grp |
2 | .5 .7379992 0.68 0.504 -1.011723 2.011723
3 | 1.25 .7379992 1.69 0.101 -.2617229 2.761723
4 | 3.25 .7379992 4.40 0.000 1.738277 4.761723
|
_cons | 3 .5218443 5.75 0.000 1.93105 4.06895
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
/* cell means using margins command */
margins grp
Adjusted predictions Number of obs = 32
Model VCE : OLS
Expression : Linear prediction, predict()
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Delta-method
| Margin Std. Err. z P>|z| [95% Conf. Interval]
-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
grp |
1 | 3 .5218443 5.75 0.000 1.977204 4.022796
2 | 3.5 .5218443 6.71 0.000 2.477204 4.522796
3 | 4.25 .5218443 8.14 0.000 3.227204 5.272796
4 | 6.25 .5218443 11.98 0.000 5.227204 7.272796
------------------------------------------------------------------------------Some Formulas
Recall the linear model,
The grand mean is the general level of scores,
The treatment effect is the elevation or depression of scores due to the jth treatment,
The error effect is unique to subject i in treatment level j,
The above implies,

From the prediction model (way above),

Partitioning Sums of Squares





Linear Statistical Models Course
Phil Ender, 17sep10, 11apr06, 12Feb98